home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0234>
- <title>
- July 26, 1993: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- July 26, 1993 The Flood Of '93
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- The Political Interest, Page 41
- Don't Settle For Hypocrisy
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> "Don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue" won't work. The Administration
- is really after a policy that says, "We don't want to know,"
- but it is inevitable that commanders will learn that some troops
- are gay without ever asking or being told--and that a homosexual
- soldier will test the regulation in court. If the military adopts
- "Don't ask, don't tell" but is successful in keeping the language
- that states, "Homosexuality is incompatible" with service, it
- would be illogical to permit gays to serve even if their sexual
- preference were concealed. Changing the current wording to incorporate
- the idea that homosexual conduct rather than homosexuality is
- "incompatible" is a distinction without a difference, unless
- one assumes gays are celibate. If, on the other hand, there
- is no assertion that homosexuality (or its pracis out of bounds,
- there is no reason to proscribe gays from openly declaring their
- existence. Complete consistency forces the conclusion that the
- game is already up: since the military concedes it should not
- ask about a person's sexual preference during the enlistment
- interview, it is in effect denying that homosexuals need to
- be weeded out.
- </p>
- <p> "Don't ask, don't tell" shouldn't work because it is morally
- reprehensible, a first-ever official codification of a policy
- that encourages concealing a fact deemed material to an institution's
- smooth functioning (assuming, again, the survival of language
- condemning homosexuality--or its practice). The law prohibits
- discrimination in part by respecting one's privacy, but in each
- case the rationale assumes that the "secret" (one's religion
- or political beliefs, for example) is immaterial to job performance.
- </p>
- <p> Some argue that "Don't ask, don't tell" expands privacy rights
- by asserting that soldiers have no obligation to tell, but the
- concealment contemplated actually asks one to live a lie in
- order to serve. Bill Clinton unthis clearly last February, when
- he asked the Pentagon to study the dilemma. "I think people
- should not be asked to lie if they're going to be allowed to
- serve," the President said. "The question is not whether they
- should be there or not. They are there. The narrow question
- of this debate is...Should you be able to say that you're
- a homosexual if you do nothing wrong? I say yes." (From there,
- by the way, Clinton articulated the only morally supportable
- reason for discharge, "sexual harassment, whether homosexual
- or heterosexual.")
- </p>
- <p> "Don't ask, don't tell" is corrosive at several levels. "By
- engaging in this hypocrisy," says the philosopher Sissela Bok,
- "by saying something matters and then ignoring it, by mandating
- duplicity, the government will further reduce the public's trust
- in the honesty of its officials." (According to a TIME/CNN poll
- conducted last fall, 63% of Americans already have little or
- no confidence that government leaders talk straight.) "It is
- ironic that the military should participate in sanctioning a
- category of falsehood by silence," says New York University
- law professor Stephen Gillers. "More than any institution in
- society, probably including the family, the military insists
- that its effectiveness demands loyalty to the organization above
- loyalty to self. If there's something amiss, you're supposed
- to speak up. If homosexuality or its practice is considered
- wrong, you're supposed to acknowledge it and others are supposed
- to expose you. This so-called compromise is dishonorable on
- its face."
- </p>
- <p> Where to from here? A court challenge should be welcomed. Someone
- needs to recertify that the truth matters, no matter the consequences.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-